Compare VWCE vs. WEBN ETF performance
Comparing 2 ETFs | Performance (August 18, 2026 - September 18, 2026) |
VWCE WEBN |
Comparison analysis Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (WEBN) belong to the World Blended Cap industry segment. Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index with VWCE using the Optimized sampling approach and WEBN applying the Full replication model. Both funds invest in the same top 3 sectors: Technology, Finance and Industrials. VWCE’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (4.44%), Apple, Inc. (4.23%) and Microsoft Corp. (3.27%). WEBN’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (4.87%), Apple, Inc. (4.59%) and Microsoft Corp. (2.79%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, VWCE is more expensive than WEBN, with 0.07%. VWCE has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$166M vs. $0 for WEBN. The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of VWCE and WEBN, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs. |
VWCE Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Accumulating - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Global Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00BK5BQT80 | WEBN Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Global Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE0003XJA0J9 |
|---|
Product Type | Passive ETF | Passive ETF | ||
Strategy | Long only | Long only | ||
NAV | $192.05 | $14.81 | ||
AuM | - | - | ||
Total AuM of fund | €75.48B | €7.71B | ||
Base currency | USD | USD | ||
TER | 0.14% | 0.07% | ||
Rating | Not rated | |||
Provider | ||||
Investment strategy | The Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF seeks to provide long-term growth of capital by tracking the performance of the index, a market-capitalisation-weighted index of common stocks of large and mid cap companies in developed and emerging countries. | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF seeks to replicate as closely as possible the performance of the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index (the "Index") whether the trend is rising of falling. | ||
Dividend policy | Capitalization | Capitalization | ||
Tax optimisation | ||||
PEA | ||||
UK Reporting | ||||
Performance and flows | Perf. Flows | Perf. Flows | ||
1 month | -0.77% To view, create a free account | -0.67% To view, create a free account | ||
3 months | +1.13% | +1.17% | ||
1 year | +17.63% | +17.81% | ||
3 years | +74.40% | - | ||
5 years | +71.18% | - | ||
Month to date | -0.99% | -0.89% | ||
Quarter to date | +1.81% | +1.86% | ||
Year to date | +13.19% | +13.33% | ||
Volatility and risk | 1 year 3 years 5 years | 1 year 3 years 5 years | ||
Volatility | To view, create a free account | To view, create a free account | ||
Perf./Volatility | ||||
Max drawdown | ||||
Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions. | ||||
Exposure | ||||
Countries | ||||
Sectors or issuer types | ||||
Number of holdings | 3758 | 3432 | ||
Weight of top 15 holdings | ||||
Top 15 holdings | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Broadcom Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Micron Technology, Inc. Eli Lilly & Co. Tesla, Inc. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. To view, create a free account | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Broadcom Inc. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Alphabet, Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Tesla, Inc. Eli Lilly & Co. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. To view, create a free account | ||
Replication | ||||
Benchmark | ||||
Replication method | ||||
Replication model | ||||
Trackinsight replication rating | Not rated | |||
Tracking error (1Y) | ||||
Tracking difference (1Y) | ||||
1Y cumulative return difference | Best +1.95bps Worst -8.28bps | Best +11.19bps Worst -8.27bps | ||
Daily return difference | Avg 0.00bps Worst -1.28bps | Avg +0.02bps Worst -1.83bps | ||
Sustainability | ||||
SDG |
Frequently asked questions about VWCE and WEBN
How did VWCE and WEBN perform in 2026?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE has delivered a year-to-date performance of 13.19%, while WEBN has returned 13.33%.
Which ETF is seeing higher flows: VWCE or WEBN?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE has recorded +€19.98B in net flows YTD, compared to +€1.91B for WEBN since the beginning of the year.
Which ETF shows higher volatility: VWCE or WEBN?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE reported a 1-year volatility of 11.42%, whereas WEBN registered volatility 11.56% over the same period.
How do VWCE and WEBN differ in sector exposure?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE is primarily exposed to sectors such as Technology, weight 35.44%, Finance, weight 18.84% and Industrials, weight 9.45%. The top sectors in WEBN feature Technology, weight 36.83%, Finance, weight 18.58% and Industrials, weight 9.38%.
How do VWCE and WEBN differ in geographic exposure?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE has its largest country exposures in USA, weight 59.54%, Japan, weight 5.93% and United Kingdom, weight 3.33%. The top countries in WEBN feature USA, weight 60.48%, Japan, weight 5.72% and Taiwan, weight 3.37%.
How do VWCE and WEBN differ in terms of holdings?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE include NVIDIA Corp., weight 4.44%, Apple, Inc., weight 4.23% and Microsoft Corp., weight 3.27%. The top positions in WEBN feature NVIDIA Corp., weight 4.87%, Apple, Inc., weight 4.59% and Microsoft Corp., weight 2.79%.
Is VWCE or WEBN more diversified?
As of 9/18/2026, VWCE holds 3758 securities, with 27.67% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. WEBN, by comparison, includes 3432 holdings and has 28.70% concentrated in its top 15.
Advertisement
About Trackinsight
Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.
Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.
In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.
This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.
Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.
More about TrackinsightETF TOOLS
PLATFORM
ETF NEWS & RESEARCH
Privacy policy | Cookie policy | | Terms of use | Imprint
