Compare URA vs. URNG ETF performance

›Compare ETFs›URA vs. URNG ETF comparison

Comparing 2 ETFs	Performance (April 6, 2026 - May 5, 2026)
URA +11.65% URNG +15.03%

Comparison analysis

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) provides exposure to the Alternative Energy segment. Global X Uranium UCITS ETF (URNG) belongs to the World Blended Cap and Alternative Energy segments. Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index and a replication model of Full replication. Energy, Industrials and Financials are URA’s top sector exposures, while URNG invests in Energy, Industrials and Materials as its top 3. URA’s top underlying securities are CAMECO (23.52%), NEXGEN ENERGY LTD (6.56%) and URANIUM ENERGY (5.91%). URNG’s top underlying securities are CAMECO (15.87%), NEXGEN ENERGY LTD (8.18%) and URANIUM ENERGY (7.36%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, URA is more expensive than URNG, with 0.65%. URA has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$198M vs. +$6.9M for URNG. The recorded 1Y bid-ask spread is +6.52bps (URA) and +41.60bps (URNG). The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and URNG, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs.

	URA Global X Uranium ETF - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Global Equities ISIN US37954Y8710	URNG Global X Uranium UCITS ETF (Acc) - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE000NDWFGA5


Product Type	Passive ETF	Passive ETF
Strategy	Long only	Long only
NAV	$54.06	$33.37
AuM	-	-
Total AuM of fund		€649M
Base currency	USD	USD
TER	0.69%	0.65%
Rating

Provider	Global X	Global X
Investment strategy	The Global X Uranium ETF (URA) provides investors access to a broad range of companies involved in uranium mining and the production of nuclear components, including those in extraction, refining, exploration, or manufacturing of equipment for the uranium and nuclear industries.	The Global X Uranium UCITS ETF (URNU) provides investors access to a broad range of companies involved in uranium mining and the production of nuclear components, including those in extraction, refining, exploration, or manufacturing of equipment for the uranium and nuclear industries.
Dividend policy	Distribution	Capitalization


Tax optimisation
PEA
UK Reporting

Performance and flows	Perf. Flows	Perf. Flows
1 month	+11.65% To view, create a free account	+15.03% To view, create a free account
3 months	+8.63%	+9.47%
1 year	+121.76%	+125.62%
3 years	+210.08%	+219.41%
5 years	+212.52%	-
Month to date	-2.67%	-2.34%
Quarter to date	+14.20%	+15.96%
Year to date	+26.22%	+28.13%

Volatility and risk	1 year 3 years 5 years	1 year 3 years 5 years
Volatility	To view, create a free account	To view, create a free account
Perf./Volatility
Max drawdown
	Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions.

Exposure
Countries
Sectors or issuer types
Number of holdings	49	48
Weight of top 15 holdings
Top 15 holdings	CAMECO NEXGEN ENERGY LTD URANIUM ENERGY ALTC ACQUISITION US63253R2013 SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT ENERGY FUELS PALADIN ENERGY HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD DENISON MINES CENTRUS ENERGY CORP BHP GROUP LTD DAEWOO ENG&CONST DOOSAN ENERBILITY ITOCHU To view, create a free account	CAMECO NEXGEN ENERGY LTD URANIUM ENERGY ALTC ACQUISITION US63253R2013 ENERGY FUELS PALADIN ENERGY DENISON MINES CENTRUS ENERGY CORP HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD DAEWOO ENG&CONST BHP GROUP LTD DOOSAN ENERBILITY KEPCO E&C YELLOW CAKE PLC To view, create a free account

Replication
Benchmark	Solactive Global Uranium Index	Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components v2 Index
Replication method
Replication model
Trackinsight replication rating
Tracking error (1Y)
Tracking difference (1Y)
1Y cumulative return difference	Best -66.50bps Worst -140.25bps	Best -51.19bps Worst -153.46bps
Daily return difference	Avg -0.24bps Worst -8.45bps	Avg -0.26bps Worst -10.42bps

Sustainability
ESG Consensus®
SDG

Frequently asked questions about URA and URNG

How did URA and URNG perform in 2026?

As of yesterday, URA has delivered a year-to-date performance of 26.22%, while URNG has returned 28.13%.

Which ETF is seeing higher flows: URA or URNG?

As of yesterday, URA has recorded +€762M in net flows YTD, compared to +€134M for URNG since the beginning of the year.

Which ETF shows higher volatility: URA or URNG?

As of yesterday, URA reported a 1-year volatility of 43.10%, whereas URNG registered volatility 45.77% over the same period.

How do URA and URNG differ in sector exposure?

As of yesterday, URA is primarily exposed to sectors such as Energy, weight 53.91%, Industrials, weight 22.79% and Financials, weight 4.83%. The top sectors in URNG feature Energy, weight 53.03%, Industrials, weight 25.15% and Materials, weight 4.58%.

How do URA and URNG differ in geographic exposure?

As of yesterday, URA has its largest country exposures in Canada, weight 46.05%, USA, weight 22.05% and Republic of Korea, weight 13.15%. The top countries in URNG feature Canada, weight 37.44%, USA, weight 27.06% and Republic of Korea, weight 14.36%.

How do URA and URNG differ in terms of holdings?

As of yesterday, URA include CAMECO, weight 23.52%, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD, weight 6.56% and URANIUM ENERGY, weight 5.91%. The top positions in URNG feature CAMECO, weight 15.87%, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD, weight 8.18% and URANIUM ENERGY, weight 7.36%.

Is URA or URNG more diversified?

As of yesterday, URA holds 49 securities, with 77.56% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. URNG, by comparison, includes 48 holdings and has 76.40% concentrated in its top 15.

Which ETF has a higher distribution yield: URA or URNG?

As of yesterday, URA has a trailing 12-month yield of 3.86%, while URNG offers 0.00%.

About Trackinsight

Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.

Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.

In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.

This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.

Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.

More about Trackinsight