Compare SPPW vs. WEBN ETF performance
Comparing 2 ETFs | Performance (January 14, 2026 - April 14, 2026) |
SPPW WEBN |
Comparison analysis State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW) provides exposure to the Developed Market Blended Cap segment. Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (WEBN) belongs to the World Blended Cap segment. Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index with SPPW using the Optimized sampling approach and WEBN applying the Full replication model. Both funds invest in the same top 3 sectors: Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. SPPW’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA (5.05%), APPLE (4.56%) and MICROSOFT-T (3.25%). WEBN’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA (4.63%), APPLE (3.96%) and MICROSOFT-T (3.09%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, SPPW is more expensive than WEBN, with 0.07%. SPPW has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$19M vs. $0 for WEBN. The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of SPPW and WEBN, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs. |
SPPW SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF - Acc - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00BFY0GT14 | WEBN Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Global Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE0003XJA0J9 |
|---|
Product Type | Passive ETF | Passive ETF | ||
Strategy | Long only | Long only | ||
NAV | $49.26 | $13.63 | ||
AuM | - | - | ||
Total AuM of fund | €15.96B | €5.04B | ||
Base currency | USD | USD | ||
E/R | 0.12% | 0.07% | ||
Rating | Not rated | |||
Provider | ||||
Investment strategy | The investment objective of the Fund is to track the performance of large and mid-sized equities in developed markets globally. | Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF seeks to replicate as closely as possible the performance of the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index (the "Index") whether the trend is rising of falling. | ||
Dividend policy | Capitalization | Capitalization | ||
Tax optimisation | ||||
PEA | ||||
UK Reporting | ||||
Performance and flows | Perf. Flows | Perf. Flows | ||
1 month | +4.60% To view, create a free account | +4.71% To view, create a free account | ||
3 months | +1.58% | +2.10% | ||
1 year | +31.72% | +33.94% | ||
3 years | +69.28% | - | ||
5 years | +70.10% | - | ||
Month to date | +7.20% | +7.80% | ||
Quarter to date | +7.20% | +7.80% | ||
Year to date | +3.41% | +4.26% | ||
Volatility and risk | 1 year 3 years 5 years | 1 year 3 years 5 years | ||
Volatility | To view, create a free account | To view, create a free account | ||
Perf./Volatility | ||||
Max drawdown | ||||
Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions. | ||||
Exposure | ||||
Countries | ||||
Sectors or issuer types | ||||
Number of holdings | 1295 | 2761 | ||
Weight of top 15 holdings | ||||
Top 15 holdings | NVIDIA APPLE MICROSOFT-T AMAZON.COM INC ALPHABET INC-CL ALPHABET INC-CL BROADCOM LIMITED META PLATFORMS TESLA LILLY JPMORGAN CHASE BERKSHIRE HATHWAY EXXON JOHNSON&JOHNSON ASML HOLDING To view, create a free account | NVIDIA APPLE MICROSOFT-T AMAZON.COM INC ALPHABET INC-CL BROADCOM LIMITED ALPHABET INC-CL TWN SEMICONT MAN META PLATFORMS TESLA LILLY JPMORGAN CHASE BERKSHIRE HATHWAY EXXON SAMSUNG ELECTR To view, create a free account | ||
Replication | ||||
Benchmark | ||||
Replication method | ||||
Replication model | ||||
Trackinsight replication rating | Not rated | |||
Tracking error (1Y) | ||||
Tracking difference (1Y) | ||||
Sustainability | ||||
ESG Consensus® |  | | ||
SDG |
Frequently asked questions about SPPW and WEBN
How did SPPW and WEBN perform in 2026?
As of yesterday, SPPW has delivered a year-to-date performance of 3.41%, while WEBN has returned 4.26%.
Which ETF is seeing higher flows: SPPW or WEBN?
As of yesterday, SPPW has recorded +€887M in net flows YTD, compared to +€452M for WEBN since the beginning of the year.
Which ETF shows higher volatility: SPPW or WEBN?
As of yesterday, SPPW reported a 1-year volatility of 11.26%, whereas WEBN registered volatility 10.92% over the same period.
How do SPPW and WEBN differ in sector exposure?
As of yesterday, SPPW is primarily exposed to sectors such as Information Technology, weight 26.04%, Financials, weight 14.32% and Industrials, weight 11.36%. The top sectors in WEBN feature Information Technology, weight 26.83%, Financials, weight 15.12% and Industrials, weight 10.64%.
How do SPPW and WEBN differ in geographic exposure?
As of yesterday, SPPW has its largest country exposures in USA, weight 67.84%, Japan, weight 6.15% and United Kingdom, weight 3.87%. The top countries in WEBN feature USA, weight 58.70%, Japan, weight 6.13% and United Kingdom, weight 3.40%.
How do SPPW and WEBN differ in terms of holdings?
As of yesterday, SPPW include NVIDIA, weight 5.05%, APPLE, weight 4.56% and MICROSOFT-T, weight 3.25%. The top positions in WEBN feature NVIDIA, weight 4.63%, APPLE, weight 3.96% and MICROSOFT-T, weight 3.09%.
Is SPPW or WEBN more diversified?
As of yesterday, SPPW holds 1295 securities, with 28.73% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. WEBN, by comparison, includes 2761 holdings and has 26.97% concentrated in its top 15.
Advertisement
About Trackinsight
Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.
Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.
In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.
This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.
Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.
More about TrackinsightETF TOOLS
PLATFORM
ETF NEWS & RESEARCH
Privacy policy | Cookie policy | | Terms of use | Imprint
