Compare SPPW vs. IWDA ETF performance
Comparing 2 ETFs | Performance (September 30, 2026 - October 30, 2026) |
SPPW IWDA |
Comparison analysis The ETFs State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDA) are passive ETFs that track the performance of the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD. As a result, they allow investors to get exposure to Developed Market Blended Cap. State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW) has a higher tracking difference (+14.75bps) than iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDA) (+1.20bps), and a higher tracking error (+5.27bps vs. +3.34bps). Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index and a replication model of Optimized sampling. Both funds invest in the same top 3 sectors: Technology, Finance and Industrials. SPPW’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (5.81%), Apple, Inc. (5.41%) and Microsoft Corp. (4.00%). IWDA’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (5.79%), Apple, Inc. (5.39%) and Microsoft Corp. (3.99%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, SPPW is cheaper than IWDA, with 0.2%. SPPW has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$17M vs. +$133M for IWDA. The recorded 1Y bid-ask spread is +5.19bps (SPPW) and +3.36bps (IWDA). The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of SPPW and IWDA, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs. |
SPPW State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF - Acc - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00BFY0GT14 | IWDA iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 |
|---|
Product Type | Passive ETF | Passive ETF | ||
Strategy | Long only | Long only | ||
NAV | $52.87 | $144.60 | ||
AuM | - | - | ||
Total AuM of fund | €20.02B | €134.76B | ||
Base currency | USD | USD | ||
TER | 0.12% | 0.2% | ||
Rating | ||||
Provider | ||||
Investment strategy | The investment objective of the Fund is to track the performance of large and mid-sized equities in developed markets globally. | The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of companies from developed countries. | ||
Dividend policy | Capitalization | Capitalization | ||
Tax optimisation | ||||
PEA | ||||
UK Reporting | ||||
Performance and flows | Perf. Flows | Perf. Flows | ||
1 month | -0.76% To view, create a free account | -0.76% To view, create a free account | ||
3 months | +1.16% | +1.13% | ||
1 year | +12.48% | +12.36% | ||
3 years | +84.36% | +83.76% | ||
5 years | +65.42% | +64.35% | ||
Month to date | -0.76% | -0.76% | ||
Quarter to date | -0.76% | -0.76% | ||
Year to date | +10.99% | +10.90% | ||
Volatility and risk | 1 year 3 years 5 years | 1 year 3 years 5 years | ||
Volatility | To view, create a free account | To view, create a free account | ||
Perf./Volatility | ||||
Max drawdown | ||||
Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions. | ||||
Exposure | ||||
Countries | ||||
Sectors or issuer types | ||||
Number of holdings | 1239 | 1249 | ||
Weight of top 15 holdings | ||||
Top 15 holdings | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Broadcom Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Tesla, Inc. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Eli Lilly & Co. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. ASML Holding NV To view, create a free account | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Broadcom Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Tesla, Inc. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Eli Lilly & Co. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. ASML Holding NV To view, create a free account | ||
Replication | ||||
Benchmark | ||||
Replication method | ||||
Replication model | ||||
Trackinsight replication rating | ||||
Tracking error (1Y) | ||||
Tracking difference (1Y) | ||||
1Y cumulative return difference | Best +16.83bps Worst +9.14bps | Best +7.46bps Worst +1.20bps | ||
Daily return difference | Avg +0.05bps Worst -0.92bps | Avg 0.00bps Worst -0.59bps | ||
Sustainability | ||||
SDG |
Frequently asked questions about SPPW and IWDA
How did SPPW and IWDA perform in 2026?
As of yesterday, SPPW has delivered a year-to-date performance of 10.99%, while IWDA has returned 10.90%.
Which ETF is seeing higher flows: SPPW or IWDA?
As of yesterday, SPPW has recorded +€2.43B in net flows YTD, compared to +€4.87B for IWDA since the beginning of the year.
Which ETF shows higher volatility: SPPW or IWDA?
As of yesterday, SPPW reported a 1-year volatility of 11.57%, whereas IWDA registered volatility 11.72% over the same period.
How do SPPW and IWDA differ in sector exposure?
As of yesterday, SPPW is primarily exposed to sectors such as Technology, weight 37.87%, Finance, weight 17.25% and Industrials, weight 9.34%. The top sectors in IWDA feature Technology, weight 37.77%, Finance, weight 17.23% and Industrials, weight 9.32%.
How do SPPW and IWDA differ in geographic exposure?
As of yesterday, SPPW has its largest country exposures in USA, weight 71.07%, Japan, weight 5.92% and United Kingdom, weight 3.66%. The top countries in IWDA feature USA, weight 70.81%, Japan, weight 5.91% and United Kingdom, weight 3.60%.
How do SPPW and IWDA differ in terms of holdings?
As of yesterday, SPPW include NVIDIA Corp., weight 5.81%, Apple, Inc., weight 5.41% and Microsoft Corp., weight 4.00%. The top positions in IWDA feature NVIDIA Corp., weight 5.79%, Apple, Inc., weight 5.39% and Microsoft Corp., weight 3.99%.
Is SPPW or IWDA more diversified?
As of yesterday, SPPW holds 1239 securities, with 32.48% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. IWDA, by comparison, includes 1249 holdings and has 32.40% concentrated in its top 15.
Advertisement
About Trackinsight
Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.
Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.
In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.
This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.
Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.
More about TrackinsightETF TOOLS
PLATFORM
ETF NEWS & RESEARCH
Privacy policy | Cookie policy | | Terms of use | Imprint
