Compare IWVU vs. IWVL ETF performance
Comparing 2 ETFs | Performance (June 2, 2026 - July 2, 2026) |
IWVU IWVL |
Comparison analysis The ETFs iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWVU) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWVL) are passive ETFs that track the performance of the MSCI World Enhanced Value Net Total Return Index - USD. As a result, they allow investors to get exposure to Value and Developed Market Blended Cap. iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWVU) has a higher tracking difference (-116.41bps) than iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWVL) (-114.00bps), and a higher tracking error (+81.51bps vs. +81.29bps). Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index and a replication model of Optimized sampling. Both funds invest in the same top 3 sectors: Technology, Finance and Consumer Cyclicals. IWVU’s top underlying securities are Micron Technology, Inc. (11.97%), Cisco Systems, Inc. (3.34%) and QUALCOMM, Inc. (2.49%). IWVL’s top underlying securities are Micron Technology, Inc. (11.97%), Cisco Systems, Inc. (3.34%) and QUALCOMM, Inc. (2.49%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, IWVU is cheaper than IWVL, with 0.25%. IWVU has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$1.6M vs. +$24M for IWVL. The recorded 1Y bid-ask spread is +13.40bps (IWVU) and +9.40bps (IWVL). The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of IWVU and IWVL, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs. |
IWVU iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (D) - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Other Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Dist USD ISIN IE00BFYTYS33 | IWVL iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Other Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00BP3QZB59 |
|---|
Product Type | Passive ETF | Passive ETF | ||
Strategy | Long only | Long only | ||
NAV | $9.55 | $78.04 | ||
AuM | - | - | ||
Total AuM of fund | €6.61B | €6.61B | ||
Base currency | USD | USD | ||
TER | 0.25% | 0.25% | ||
Rating | ||||
Provider | ||||
Investment strategy | The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of a sub-set of MSCI World stocks that capture undervalued stocks relative to their fundamentals. | The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of a sub-set of MSCI World stocks that capture undervalued stocks relative to their fundamentals. | ||
Dividend policy | Distribution | Capitalization | ||
Tax optimisation | ||||
PEA | ||||
UK Reporting | ||||
Performance and flows | Perf. Flows | Perf. Flows | ||
1 month | -4.24% To view, create a free account | -4.24% To view, create a free account | ||
3 months | +23.46% | +23.47% | ||
1 year | +54.74% | +54.77% | ||
3 years | +104.62% | +104.67% | ||
5 years | +111.63% | +111.61% | ||
Month to date | -1.92% | -1.92% | ||
Quarter to date | -1.92% | -1.92% | ||
Year to date | +29.70% | +29.71% | ||
Volatility and risk | 1 year 3 years 5 years | 1 year 3 years 5 years | ||
Volatility | To view, create a free account | To view, create a free account | ||
Perf./Volatility | ||||
Max drawdown | ||||
Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions. | ||||
Exposure | ||||
Countries | ||||
Sectors or issuer types | ||||
Number of holdings | 400 | 400 | ||
Weight of top 15 holdings | ||||
Top 15 holdings | Micron Technology, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. QUALCOMM, Inc. Verizon Communications, Inc. Toyota Motor Corp. AT&T, Inc. Comcast Corp. British American Tobacco plc NXP Semiconductors NV General Motors Co. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Pfizer Inc. Shell Plc Nokia Oyj HSBC Holdings Plc To view, create a free account | Micron Technology, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. QUALCOMM, Inc. Verizon Communications, Inc. Toyota Motor Corp. AT&T, Inc. Comcast Corp. British American Tobacco plc NXP Semiconductors NV General Motors Co. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Pfizer Inc. Shell Plc Nokia Oyj HSBC Holdings Plc To view, create a free account | ||
Replication | ||||
Benchmark | ||||
Replication method | ||||
Replication model | ||||
Trackinsight replication rating | ||||
Tracking error (1Y) | ||||
Tracking difference (1Y) | ||||
1Y cumulative return difference | Best +27.24bps Worst -116.41bps | Best +28.39bps Worst -114.00bps | ||
Daily return difference | Avg -0.32bps Worst -39.89bps | Avg -0.31bps Worst -39.81bps | ||
Sustainability | ||||
SDG |
Frequently asked questions about IWVU and IWVL
How did IWVU and IWVL perform in 2026?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU has delivered a year-to-date performance of 29.70%, while IWVL has returned 29.71%.
Which ETF is seeing higher flows: IWVU or IWVL?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU has recorded +€138M in net flows YTD, compared to +€572M for IWVL since the beginning of the year.
Which ETF shows higher volatility: IWVU or IWVL?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU reported a 1-year volatility of 15.37%, whereas IWVL registered volatility 15.37% over the same period.
How do IWVU and IWVL differ in sector exposure?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU is primarily exposed to sectors such as Technology, weight 32.18%, Finance, weight 16.94% and Consumer Cyclicals, weight 8.47%. The top sectors in IWVL feature Technology, weight 32.18%, Finance, weight 16.94% and Consumer Cyclicals, weight 8.47%.
How do IWVU and IWVL differ in geographic exposure?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU has its largest country exposures in USA, weight 44.96%, Japan, weight 19.95% and United Kingdom, weight 8.15%. The top countries in IWVL feature USA, weight 44.96%, Japan, weight 19.95% and United Kingdom, weight 8.15%.
How do IWVU and IWVL differ in terms of holdings?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU include Micron Technology, Inc., weight 11.97%, Cisco Systems, Inc., weight 3.34% and QUALCOMM, Inc., weight 2.49%. The top positions in IWVL feature Micron Technology, Inc., weight 11.97%, Cisco Systems, Inc., weight 3.34% and QUALCOMM, Inc., weight 2.49%.
Is IWVU or IWVL more diversified?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU holds 400 securities, with 33.09% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. IWVL, by comparison, includes 400 holdings and has 33.09% concentrated in its top 15.
Which ETF has a higher distribution yield: IWVU or IWVL?
As of 7/2/2026, IWVU has a trailing 12-month yield of 1.89%, while IWVL offers 0.00%.
Advertisement
About Trackinsight
Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.
Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.
In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.
This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.
Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.
More about TrackinsightETF TOOLS
PLATFORM
ETF NEWS & RESEARCH
Privacy policy | Cookie policy | | Terms of use | Imprint
