Compare IDWR vs. IWDA ETF performance
Comparing 2 ETFs | Performance (August 25, 2026 - September 25, 2026) |
IDWR IWDA |
Comparison analysis The ETFs iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IDWR) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDA) are passive ETFs that track the performance of the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD. As a result, they allow investors to get exposure to Developed Market Blended Cap. iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IDWR) has a higher tracking difference (-39.92bps) than iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDA) (+1.77bps), and a higher tracking error (+3.57bps vs. +3.16bps). Both funds use a Direct (Physical) replication method to follow their index and a replication model of Optimized sampling. Both funds invest in the same top 3 sectors: Technology, Finance and Industrials. IDWR’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (5.53%), Apple, Inc. (5.07%) and Microsoft Corp. (3.90%). IWDA’s top underlying securities are NVIDIA Corp. (5.53%), Apple, Inc. (5.07%) and Microsoft Corp. (3.90%). With a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, IDWR is more expensive than IWDA, with 0.2%. IDWR has a 3M average daily volume (ADV) of +$5.8M vs. +$126M for IWDA. The recorded 1Y bid-ask spread is +4.59bps (IDWR) and +3.43bps (IWDA). The table below shows the full side-by-side ETF comparison of IDWR and IWDA, with detailed data on performance, flows, liquidity, exposure to individual stocks, segments, sectors, and geographies, helping you select the best ETFs. |
IDWR iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (Dist) - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities ISIN IE00B0M62Q58 | IWDA iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF - USDThis ETF provides exposure to Large and Mid-Cap Developed markets Equities Share class Acc USD ISIN IE00B4L5Y983 |
|---|
Product Type | Passive ETF | Passive ETF | ||
Strategy | Long only | Long only | ||
NAV | $105.54 | $147.28 | ||
AuM | - | - | ||
Total AuM of fund | €134.62B | |||
Base currency | USD | USD | ||
TER | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
Rating | ||||
Provider | ||||
Investment strategy | The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of companies from 23 developed countries, covering 85% of the listed equities in each country. | The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of companies from developed countries. | ||
Dividend policy | Distribution | Capitalization | ||
Tax optimisation | ||||
PEA | ||||
UK Reporting | ||||
Performance and flows | Perf. Flows | Perf. Flows | ||
1 month | -0.31% To view, create a free account | -0.27% To view, create a free account | ||
3 months | +4.44% | +4.54% | ||
1 year | +17.63% | +18.05% | ||
3 years | +77.86% | +79.46% | ||
5 years | +70.19% | +72.75% | ||
Month to date | -0.15% | -0.13% | ||
Quarter to date | +2.88% | +2.98% | ||
Year to date | +12.69% | +12.96% | ||
Volatility and risk | 1 year 3 years 5 years | 1 year 3 years 5 years | ||
Volatility | To view, create a free account | To view, create a free account | ||
Perf./Volatility | ||||
Max drawdown | ||||
Create a free Trackinsight Essentials account to unlock insights Access exclusive metrics and features to support your investment decisions. | ||||
Exposure | ||||
Countries | ||||
Sectors or issuer types | ||||
Number of holdings | 1252 | 1252 | ||
Weight of top 15 holdings | ||||
Top 15 holdings | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Broadcom Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Tesla, Inc. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Eli Lilly & Co. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. To view, create a free account | NVIDIA Corp. Apple, Inc. Microsoft Corp. Amazon.com, Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Broadcom Inc. Alphabet, Inc. Meta Platforms, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. Tesla, Inc. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Eli Lilly & Co. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. To view, create a free account | ||
Replication | ||||
Benchmark | ||||
Replication method | ||||
Replication model | ||||
Trackinsight replication rating | ||||
Tracking error (1Y) | ||||
Tracking difference (1Y) | ||||
1Y cumulative return difference | Best -28.19bps Worst -41.93bps | Best +7.46bps Worst +1.60bps | ||
Daily return difference | Avg -0.13bps Worst -0.76bps | Avg +0.01bps Worst -0.59bps | ||
Sustainability | ||||
SDG |
Frequently asked questions about IDWR and IWDA
How did IDWR and IWDA perform in 2026?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR has delivered a year-to-date performance of 12.69%, while IWDA has returned 12.96%.
Which ETF is seeing higher flows: IDWR or IWDA?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR has recorded -€77M in net flows YTD, compared to +€4.58B for IWDA since the beginning of the year.
Which ETF shows higher volatility: IDWR or IWDA?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR reported a 1-year volatility of 11.70%, whereas IWDA registered volatility 11.86% over the same period.
How do IDWR and IWDA differ in sector exposure?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR is primarily exposed to sectors such as Technology, weight 35.72%, Finance, weight 17.97% and Industrials, weight 9.54%. The top sectors in IWDA feature Technology, weight 35.71%, Finance, weight 18.01% and Industrials, weight 9.57%.
How do IDWR and IWDA differ in geographic exposure?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR has its largest country exposures in USA, weight 70.34%, Japan, weight 5.78% and United Kingdom, weight 3.70%. The top countries in IWDA feature USA, weight 70.32%, Japan, weight 5.80% and United Kingdom, weight 3.68%.
How do IDWR and IWDA differ in terms of holdings?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR include NVIDIA Corp., weight 5.53%, Apple, Inc., weight 5.07% and Microsoft Corp., weight 3.90%. The top positions in IWDA feature NVIDIA Corp., weight 5.53%, Apple, Inc., weight 5.07% and Microsoft Corp., weight 3.90%.
Is IDWR or IWDA more diversified?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR holds 1252 securities, with 31.02% of its assets allocated to its top 15 positions. IWDA, by comparison, includes 1252 holdings and has 31.00% concentrated in its top 15.
Which ETF has a higher distribution yield: IDWR or IWDA?
As of 9/25/2026, IDWR has a trailing 12-month yield of 0.86%, while IWDA offers 0.00%.
Advertisement
About Trackinsight
Since our founding in 2016, we have been at the forefront of the industry, delivering accessible, comprehensive, and reliable tools to support the evolving needs of investors.
Over the past decade, Trackinsight has expanded its operations across six countries, serving thousands of professional investors. We’ve consistently innovated to provide cutting-edge solutions that meet the changing demands of the ETF market.
In 2024, Kepler Cheuvreux, a leading independent European financial services firm, acquired a majority stake in Trackinsight, becoming the company's principal shareholder.
This strategic partnership solidifies Trackinsight's position as a premier provider of ETF selection and analysis tools, while strengthening Kepler Cheuvreux’s commitment to becoming a leading player in the ETF sector.
Together, we are committed to offering advanced services that empower professional investors, advisors, institutions, and issuers. This new step enables us to deliver even more comprehensive and innovative technological solutions, driving ETF investing to new heights.
More about TrackinsightETF TOOLS
PLATFORM
ETF NEWS & RESEARCH
Privacy policy | Cookie policy | | Terms of use | Imprint
